Characteristics of Team Physicians in the National Football League: The Road to Success and a Call for Diversity.

Background: The role of team physician (TP) in professional sports is a highly coveted position within sports medicine. There is currently limited research on the demographic characteristics of TPs within the National Football League (NFL). Purpose: To identify demographic characteristics and educational backgrounds of NFL head TPs (HTPs) and assistant TPs (ATPs). Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: A list of TPs was identified through the National Football League Physicians Society (NFLPS). Variables investigated include age, gender, race, medical specialty, location and year of residency and fellowship training, leadership among medical societies and editorial boards, academic rank, and personal Scopus Hirsch index (h-index). Linear regression was performed to determine correlation, and t tests were used to assess differences in the h-index. Results: Of the 170 TPs, 21.2% were HTPs and 78.8% were ATPs. TPs were 97.6% male, 91.2% were non-Hispanic White, and 60% had attained an academic rank. The mean ages of the HTPs and ATPs were a 56.2 ± 9.6 and 52.6 ± 9.6 years, respectively (P = .047). Among orthopaedic surgeons, the most common subspecialties were sports medicine (70.5%), foot and ankle (7.6%), and spine (5.7%). Of the TPs, 48.2% and 32.9% worked for a team in the same state in which they graduated residency and fellowship, respectively. HTPs and ATPs had been in the NFLPS for a mean of 16.9 ± 10.8 and 8.8 ± 8.3 years, respectively (P < .001). Further, TPs holding an academic rank had a mean h-index of 14.0 ± 19.3, while those without an academic rank had a mean h-index of 6.2 ± 8.8 (P < .01). HTPs and ATPs had mean h-indices of 15.7 ± 15.9 and 9.6 ± 16.3 (P = .0503), respectively. Conclusion: TPs in the NFL are typically White men in their mid-50s who have trained at specific high-ranking institutions and obtained a fellowship in sports medicine. HTPs were likely to be older with longer tenures within the NFLPS and with more impactful research than their ATP counterparts.

Patient and Surgeon Perceptions Regarding Microdiscectomy Surgery: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Social Media Posts.

BACKGROUND: Social media offers a powerful and expanding platform for sharing the patient experience with a large audience through an unsolicited perspective. The content may influence future perceptions around surgical care. OBJECTIVE: To analyze publicly available content on a major social media outlet related to microdiscectomy surgery based on perspective, location, timing, content, tone, and patient satisfaction. METHODS: A query of content was performed for the study period 1 January 2019 to 1 January 2021. Relevant content was identified by hashtag "#microdiscectomy." The initial query returned 10,050 publicly available posts, and the 1500 most "liked" posts were included for evaluation. Content was subsequently classified, characterized, and analyzed. RESULTS: Patients created 72.9% of microdiscectomy-related content, and spine surgeons created 23.5%. Regarding region, 77.0% of posts originated in the United States. The majority portrayed the patient experience in the postoperative phase of care (86.0%), with the primary reference to activities of daily living (56.9%). Only 1.7% of posts depicted the surgical incision site. The connotation of posts was deemed positive in 78.5% of cases. Of the posts referencing satisfaction, 98.3% depicted patient satisfaction with the surgical outcome. Patient posts in the postoperative phase of care (>1 week after surgery) were more than 2 times as likely to express positive tone (OR = 2.07, P ≤ 0.013) with their clinical course compared with patient posts outside the postoperative period. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Overall, social media posts are written in a positive tone, express satisfaction with surgical outcome, typically occur in the postoperative period of care, and depict activities of daily living. These popular mechanisms of communication, such as Instagram, offer spine surgeons unique insights into the true patient experience and may provide an opportunity for surgeons to assess patient feedback, influence patient perceptions, and enhance delivery of lumbar spine care.

Social Media Posts Pertaining to Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) Surgery: A Cross-sectional Analysis of Patient and Surgeon Perceptions.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVE: To analyze publicly available content on a major social media outlet related to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery based on perspective, location, timing, content, tone, and patient satisfaction. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Social media offers a powerful platform for sharing the patient experience with the public through an unfiltered perspective. Social media content may influence future perceptions around surgical care and postings around ACDF have not been previously reported. METHODS: A query of content from a major social media outlet was performed for the study period January 1, 2018, to January 1, 2020, and returned 6500 publicly available posts. Content was identified by the hashtags "#acdf" or "#acdfsurgery." Content was ranked by number of "likes." Of the 1500 most popular posts, 1136 related to ACDF surgery and were included. Post content was characterized and classified. RESULTS: Patients created 85% of ACDF-related content and spine surgeons created 11.8%. Most posts portrayed the patient experience in the postoperative period and depicted patients performing activities of daily living, participating in sports, or completing work activities (54.4%). The connotation of posts was deemed to be positive in 79.2% of cases. In regard to their care or state of health as it related to ACDF surgery, 59.8% of patients expressed satisfaction, whereas 14.1% expressed dissatisfaction. Female patients were >4 times as likely to express dissatisfaction (odds ratio=4.16, P =<0.0001), with their clinical course compared with their male counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: Patients were the source of most posts on a major social media outlet that pertained to ACDF surgery with a majority reporting positive tone and satisfaction. These mechanisms of communication offer surgeons unique insights into patient experience and may provide an opportunity for surgeons to assess patient feedback, influence patient perceptions, and enhance delivery of cervical spine care.

Predictive Analysis of Healthcare Resource Utilization after Elective Spine Surgery.

Introduction: The management of degenerative spine pathology continues to be a significant source of costs to the US healthcare system. Besides surgery, utilization of healthcare resources after spine surgery drives costs. The responsibility of managing costs is gradually shifting to patients and providers. Patient-centered predictors of healthcare utilization after elective spine surgery may identify targets for cost reduction and value creation. Therefore, our study aims to quantify patterns of healthcare utilization and identify risk factors that predict high healthcare utilization after elective spine surgery. Methods: A total of 623 patients who underwent elective spine surgery at a tertiary academic medical center by one of three fellowship-trained orthopedic spine surgeons between 2013 and 2018 were identified in this retrospective cohort study. Healthcare utilization was quantified including advanced spine imaging, emergency and urgent care visits, hospital readmission, reoperation, PT/OT referrals, opioid prescriptions, epidural steroid injections, and pain management referrals. Patient variables, namely, the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification system, were assessed as potential predictors for healthcare utilization. Results: Among all patients, a wide range of health utilization was identified. Age, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and American Society of Anesthesiology class were identified as positive predictors of postoperative healthcare utilization including emergency department visits, spine imaging studies, opioid and nerve blocker prescriptions, inpatient rehabilitation, any referrals, and pain management referrals. Conclusions: Markers of patient health-such as CCI and ASA class-may be used to predict healthcare utilization following elective spine surgery. Identifying at-risk patients and addressing these challenges prior to surgery is an important step to deliver efficient postoperative care. Level of Evidence: 3.

Characterizing Leadership Trends in Hand Surgery Fellowship Programs.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to characterize academic and demographic factors most associated with fellowship director (FD) roles in hand surgery programs. A secondary aim was to characterize educational and employment trends. The final aim was to compare these findings with those in other orthopedic subspecialties. Methods: Domestic programs were identified using the American Society for Surgery of the Hand fellowship directory. Data were collected via internet searches of publicly available information and direct contact with programs. Variables included demographic characteristics (age, sex, and race/ethnicity), education and employment history, Hirsch index (H-index) research productivity, and membership of select hand surgery societies. Results: Information about 86 FDs was collected from a total of 88 identified hand surgery fellowships. Seventy-six (88.4%) FDs were men, whereas 10 (11.6%) were women. The mean age was 53.3 years. Most FDs (n = 68, 79.1%) completed their residency in orthopedic surgery. The average Scopus H-index was 16.3. Most FDs were White (n = 64, 74%) followed by Asian (n = 14, 16%). The mean duration from fellowship completion to FD appointment was 12.6 years, whereas the mean duration of employment at an institution before FD appointment was 17.9 years. The mean duration of tenure as an FD was 9.8 years. Twenty-eight (32.94%) individuals served as an FD at their residency institution and 20 (23.5%) led at their fellowship institution. The most frequently attended residency institution by FDs was University of Pennsylvania, whereas Mayo Clinic was the most frequently attended fellowship program. Six FDs have served as the presidents of a hand surgery society. Conclusions: Fellowship directors are largely White and men. They are distinguished by their research productivity. A few select programs contribute an outsized proportion of individuals to FD positions. This may be due to a pipeline effect or because applicants with ambition to become FDs pursue specific programs for training. Clinical relevance: This study characterizes the academic/demographic factors of hand surgery FDs.

Outcomes in Pediatric Hip FAI Surgery: a Scoping Review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Femoracetabular impingement (FAI) is a common source of hip pain in children and adolescents. While nonoperative therapies and open surgical procedures can be effective, hip arthroscopy is a minimally invasive treatment option with substantial benefit. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the current role of hip arthroscopy in treating FAI within the pediatric population. This article examines its efficacy through a review of hip arthroscopy outcomes in the contemporary orthopaedic literature. RECENT FINDINGS: Morphologic changes in the acetabulum and proximal femur seen in FAI can be attributed to a multitude of etiologies-including idiopathic FAI, Legg-Calve-Perthes, and slipped capital femoral epiphysis. In general, arthroscopic treatment of FAI secondary to these conditions leads to statistically significant improvements in pain and patient-reported outcomes in the short and long term. In the pediatric athlete, repetitive stress on the hip perpetuates FAI and can drastically hinder performance. Hip arthroscopy allows for a high rate of return to sport with minimal morbidity in this population. Overall, pediatric hip arthroscopy is effective in treating FAI secondary to a wide variety of conditions. Despite its clinical benefits, patients and their families should be counseled regarding alternative treatments, potential complications, and return to play.

Increased 30-Day Postoperative Readmission and Medical Complication Rates Among Patients 65 Years and Older Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to use a large national database to assess short-term adverse events following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in patients 65 years and older. Methods: The ACS NSQIP database was queried to identify patients that underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair between December 31, 2015, and January 1, 2017. Patients were split into two groups: 1) between 40-65 years old and 2) 65+ years old. Cases involving open rotator cuff repair, total shoulder arthroplasty, hemiarthroplasty, and emergency surgery were excluded. Exact matching was used to control for confounding variables, including sex, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, operative time, and several medical comorbidities. After matching, the incidence of several 30-day patient complication measures was compared between the groups. Binary logistic regression was used to identify covariates associated with various 30-day complications. Results: A total of 17,880 patients were included in the study. 69.4% (n = 12,404) patients were between 40 and 65 years old and 30.6% (n = 5,476) patients were 65+ years old. After matching, 9,210 patients were included in the final analysis. After matching, patients 65 years and older were more likely to experience 30-day unplanned readmission (P = .035) and overall medical complications (P = .036). There were no significant differences in most 30-day complication measures, including mortality (P = .250), reoperation (P = .449), non-home discharge (P = .255), surgical complications (P = .146), and several medical complications, including myocardial infarction (P = .165), deep venous thromboembolism (P = .206), pulmonary embolism (P = .196), and cerebrovascular accident (P > .999) between the two age groups. Conclusions: In this matched cohort study, patients 65 years and older experienced a higher rate of 30-day unplanned readmission and overall medical complications following elective arthroscopic rotator cuff repair relative to patients under 65. However, these older patients did not have significantly worse rates of other 30-day complication measures, including mortality, reoperation, return to the OR, and non-home discharge.

The Drivers of Persistent Opioid Use and Its Impact on Healthcare Utilization After Elective Spine Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of and risk factors for persistent opioid use after elective cervical and lumbar spine procedures and to quantify postoperative healthcare utilization in this patient population. METHODS: Patients were retrospectively identified who underwent elective spine surgery for either cervical or lumbar degenerative pathology between November 1, 2013, and September 30, 2018, at a single academic center. Patients were split into 2 cohorts, including patients with and without opioid use at 180-days postoperatively. Baseline patient demographics, underlying comorbidities, surgical variables, and preoperative/postoperative opioid use were assessed. Health resource utilization metrics within 1 year postoperatively (ie, imaging studies, emergency and urgent care visits, hospital readmissions, opioid prescriptions, etc.) were compared between these 2 groups. RESULTS: 583 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 16.6% had opioid persistence after surgery. Opioid persistence was associated with ASA score ≥3 (P = .004), diabetes (P = .019), class I obesity (P = .012), and an opioid prescription in the 60 days prior to surgery (P = .006). Independent risk factors for opioid persistence assessed via multivariate regression included multi-level lumbar fusion (RR = 2.957), cervical central stenosis (RR = 2.761), and pre-operative opioid use (RR = 2.668). Opioid persistence was associated with higher rates of health care utilization, including more radiographs (P < .001), computed tomography (CT) scans (.007), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies (P = .014), emergency department (ED) visits (.009), pain medicine referrals (P < .001), and spinal injections (P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Opioid persistence is associated with higher rates of health care utilization within 1 year after elective spine surgery.

Determining the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Hand Surgery Fellowship Education.

The purpose of this study is to report the impact of COVID-19 on hand surgery fellow learning and preparedness for practice. A multi-dimensional questionnaire was distributed to current hand fellows and fellowship directors across the United States. Survey questions included fellowship location, institutional response, impact on practice, education and job search. Thirty-two hand surgery fellows and 14 fellowship directors completed the survey. Of fellows, 59% reported a greater than 75% decrease in case volume. Mean hours worked per week per fellow decreased by 52%. All fellowship directors and 94% of fellows did not expect COVID-19 to impact their ability to graduate, and nearly all fellows felt prepared to start practice after fellowship training. However, many fellows expressed concern about job opportunities. The work hours and exposure of hand surgery fellows to elective surgical cases have been adversely impacted by COVID-19. Nevertheless, current hand fellows feel prepared to enter practice. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 31(1):048-052, 2022).

Comparison of Lumbar Fusion With and Without Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Stenosis Using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT).

Study design This was a retrospective analysis of patient-reported outcomes across a two-year period. Summary of background data Patients suffering from lumbar stenosis may experience low back pain, neurogenic claudication, and weakness. Patients can benefit from surgical intervention, including decompression with or without fusion. However, the superiority of any single fusion construct remains controversial. Objective The goal of this study was to compare Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT) measures in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis treated surgically with lumbar decompression and fusion with or without interbody fusion. Methods A retrospective review of patients with lumbar stenosis undergoing lumbar decompression and one-level fusion was performed. PROMIS® CAT Physical Function (PF) and Pain Interference (PI) assessments were administered using a web-based platform pre and postoperatively. Results Sixty patients with lumbar stenosis undergoing one-level lumbar fusion were identified. Twenty-seven patients underwent posterior lumbar fusion (PSF) alone and 33 underwent one-level lumbar interbody fusion (IF). Patients undergoing IF had better absolute PF scores compared to patients undergoing PSF at one-year postoperatively (48.9 v 41.6, p=0.002) and greater relative improvement in PF scores from baseline at one-year postoperatively (D13.6 v D8.6, p=0.02). A subgroup analysis of patients undergoing TLIF v PSF showed better absolute PF scores at the one-year follow-up in the TLIF group (47.1 v 42.3, p=0.04). No differences were found in PI scores at any time point between the PSF and IF groups. Patients undergoing IF had significantly shorter hospital stays (2.5 v 3.3 days, p=0.02) compared to patients undergoing PSF. Conclusions Patients with lumbar spinal stenosis treated with one-level IF reported higher absolute PF scores and experienced greater relative improvement in PF scores from baseline at one-year follow-up compared to patients treated with PSF alone. Additionally, IF is associated with a decreased length of hospital stay as compared to PSF.

Determining the incidence and risk factors for short-term complications following distal biceps tendon repair.

BACKGROUND: Distal biceps rupture is a relatively uncommon injury that can significantly affect quality of life. Early complications following biceps tendon repair are not well described in the literature. This study utilizes a national surgical database to determine the incidence of and predictors for short-term complications following distal biceps tendon repair. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify patients undergoing distal biceps repair between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2017. Patient demographic variables of sex, age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, functional status, and several comorbidities were collected for each patient, along with 30-day postoperative complications. Binary logistic regression was used to calculate risk ratios for these complications using patient predictor variables. RESULTS: Early postoperative surgical complications (0.5%)-which were mostly infections (0.4%)-and medical complications (0.3%) were rare. A readmission risk factor was diabetes (risk ratio [RR], 4.238; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.180-15.218). Non-home discharge risk factors were smoking (RR, 3.006; 95% CI, 1.123-8.044) and ≥60 years of age (RR, 4.150; 95% CI, 1.611- 10.686). Maleness was protective for medical complications (RR, 0.024; 95% CI, 0.005-0.126). Surgical complication risk factors were obese class II (RR, 4.120; 95% CI, 1.123-15.120), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; RR, 21.981; 95% CI, 3.719-129.924), and inpatient surgery (RR, 8.606; 95% CI, 2.266-32.689). CONCLUSIONS: Complication rates after distal biceps repair are low. Various patient demographics, medical comorbidities, and surgical factors were all predictive of short-term complications.

Spine Surgery and COVID-19: The Influence of Practice Type on Preparedness, Response, and Economic Impact.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To investigate preparation, response, and economic impact of COVID-19 on private, public, academic, and privademic spine surgeons. METHODS: AO Spine COVID-19 and Spine Surgeon Global Impact Survey includes domains on surgeon demographics, location of practice, type of practice, COVID-19 perceptions, institutional preparedness and response, personal and practice impact, and future perceptions. The survey was distributed by AO Spine via email to members (n = 3805). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify differences between practice settings. RESULTS: A total of 902 surgeons completed the survey. In all, 45.4% of respondents worked in an academic setting, 22.9% in privademics, 16.1% in private practice, and 15.6% in public hospitals. Academic practice setting was independently associated with performing elective and emergent spine surgeries at the time of survey distribution. A majority of surgeons reported a >75% decrease in case volume. Private practice and privademic surgeons reported losing income at a higher rate compared with academic or public surgeons. Practice setting was associated with personal protective equipment availability and economic issues as a source of stress. CONCLUSIONS: The current study indicates that practice setting affected both preparedness and response to COVID-19. Surgeons in private and privademic practices reported increased worry about the economic implications of the current crisis compared with surgeons in academic and public hospitals. COVID-19 decreased overall clinical productivity, revenue, and income. Government response to the current pandemic and preparation for future pandemics needs to be adaptable to surgeons in all practice settings.

Trends in leadership at shoulder and elbow fellowships: a cross-sectional demographic review.

OBJECTIVE: To determine educational characteristics, trends, and demographics among shoulder and elbow fellowship leaders (FLs). BACKGROUND: Fellowship leaders in shoulder and elbow impart lasting impact on trainees and field development. Four previous studies have analyzed the characteristics and career path trends among orthopedic surgery subspecialty FLs (spine, adult reconstruction, trauma, and sports medicine). We characterized the educational backgrounds and demographic composition of all 40 FLs including fellowship directors (FD), fellowship co-directors (co-FD), and associate fellowship directors (associate FD) of 31 American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES)-accredited shoulder and elbow fellowships in the United States. We additionally compiled the residency and fellowship institutions that trained FLs as framework for aspiring leaders in orthopedic surgery. METHODS: Using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) directory website page "ASES-Recognized Shoulder and Elbow Fellowship Programs," we identified all active shoulder and elbow fellowships within the United States as well as associated FL identifiers. Compiled data points include age, sex, ethnicity, residency/fellowship training location, time since education completion until FL appointment, length in FL role, personal research Scopus H-index, and major society and journal leadership position history. RESULTS: We analyzed data from all 40 active FLs across 31 ASES-accredited shoulder and elbow fellowships, encompassing 26 FDs, 13 co-FDs, and 1 associate FD. The majority of FLs (97.5%) were male whereas 2.5% were female, with racial/ethnic identification of 80.0% Caucasian, 10.0% Asian/Pacific Islander, and 10.0% Middle Eastern. The mean Scopus H-index of the FLs was 24.63 ± 16.43. The top residency programs for producing future FLs were the University of Pittsburgh, University of Pennsylvania, University of Nebraska/Creighton, Hospital for Special Surgery, and Brown University (all n = 2). The top fellowship programs for producing future FLs were Mayo Clinic (n = 6), Columbia University (n = 6), San Francisco/California Pacific (n = 4), and Washington University in St Louis (n = 4). CONCLUSION: Shoulder and elbow fellowship leaders graduate with increased frequency from certain fellowship programs with lesser correlation to residency institutions. Programs demonstrate high retention of prior trainees as future FLs. All FLs are distinguished by high indices of research productivity; however, demographic diversity remains limited, which is comparable to prior orthopedic subspecialty FL investigations.

Revision ACL reconstruction has higher incidence of 30-day hospital readmission, reoperation, and surgical complications relative to primary procedures.

PURPOSE: Although there has been substantial improvement in ACL reconstructive surgery, graft failure remains a devastating complication for some patients. Revision procedures are inherently more complex and technically challenging. The purpose of this study is to determine the incidence of short-term complications after these procedures and to compare trends in operative length, relative valuation, and reimbursement after primary versus revision ACL reconstruction. METHODS: Primary and revision arthroscopic ACL reconstruction cases were identified on the American College of Surgeons' NSQIP database using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) and International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2017. Demographics, patient variables, and surgical variables were compared between primary and revision groups using Chi-squared tests. Logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for revision ACL reconstruction. Various 30-day outcome measures were compared between the primary and revision ACL reconstruction groups. Various measures of valuation-including total relative value units (RVU) and reimbursement per minute-were calculated and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 8292 patients-8135 primary and 157 revision procedures-were included in the final cohort. Higher ASA scores were associated with revision ACL reconstructions. Patients undergoing revision procedures were less likely to have an ASA score of 1 (p < 0.001) and more likely to have an ASA score of 2 (p = 0.004) or 3 (p = 0.020). Revision ACL reconstruction was associated with higher rates of poor 30-day outcome measures, including unplanned readmission (p = 0.029), reoperation (p = 0.012), return to the OR (p = 0.012), and surgical complications (p = 0.021). The total RVUs and reimbursement for revision procedures were significantly greater than those for primary procedures (p < 0.001). However, when accounting for operative time, the RVU/minute and reimbursement/minute were similar between the two groups (n.s.). CONCLUSIONS: Relative to primary ACL reconstruction, revision ACL procedures are associated with worse short-term outcomes-including unplanned readmission, reoperation, return to the OR, and surgical complications. A greater ASA score was independently predictive of revision ACL surgery. The current RVU system undervalues revision ACL procedures, considering the increased operative time and complexity of such procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Short-Term Outcomes After Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Octogenarians: A Matched Analysis.

Introduction Studies have shown that the use of total shoulder arthroplasty is increasing every year in the United Stated at a rate higher than that of total hip or total knee arthroplasty. As the population of the United States continues to age, it is becoming more important for surgeons to understand the true impact of age on outcomes and complications following procedures such a total shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to determine if octogenarians have poorer outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty compared to a younger, matched control group. Methods Data was obtained through the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (ACS NSQIP). Patients who had undergone total shoulder arthroplasty were identified by Current Procedural Terminology code (23472). Indication for arthroplasty was determined by ICD9/10 code (osteoarthritis, fracture, other). Each octogenarian was matched 1:1 to a non-octogenarian based on sex, BMI, ASA class, medical comorbidities, functional status, and surgical indication for arthroplasty by propensity scoring. A subgroup analysis was performed to compare outcomes between only those patients who underwent TSA for osteoarthritis.Outcomes of interest were assessed between the two groups for statistical significance using a chi-squared test or fisher exact test for expected values of less than 5. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Results After matching, octogenarians were found to be at higher risk of readmission (4.7% vs. 3.3%, p=0.046), non-home discharge (27.1% vs. 9.4%, p<0.001), and overall surgical (4.4% vs. 2.5%, p=0.006) and medical complications (3.7% vs. 2.4%, p=0.039). In the setting of TSA for osteoarthritis only, however, octogenarians were only at higher risk for non-home discharge (22.4% vs. 7.5%, p<0.001). Conclusions Octogenarians are at higher risk of some complications following total shoulder arthroplasty but fewer than has been previously reported, particularly in the setting of arthroplasty for the treatment of arthritis.

Return to Play Guidelines After Cervical Spine Injuries in American Football Athletes: A Literature-Based Review.

STUDY DESIGN: Literature-based review. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate clinical and case studies related to return to play (RTP) after cervical spine injuries in elite American football athletes and to formulate guidelines to help health care practitioners manage these conditions. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: American football athletes are at unique risk of cervical spine injury and appropriate case-by-case management of cervical spine injuries is necessary for these athletes. Despite this need, no standardized guidelines exist for RTP after cervical spine injury. METHODS: Observational or case-based articles relating to RTP after cervical spine injury in American football athletes were curated from PubMed/EMBASE databases. Primary literature published before December 1, 2019 involving National Football League (NFL) or National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) athletes met inclusion criteria. RESULTS: The data acquisition process yielded 28 studies addressing cervical spine injuries and RTP in American football athletes. Stingers/burners were the most common injury and placed athletes at higher risk of a more severe re-injury. Transient quadriplegia, cervical stenosis, cervical disc herniation (CDH), and cervical fractures have a more significant impact on the long-term health and career longevity of the American football athlete. As such, the literature offers some guidance for management of these athletes, including average time for RTP in patients treated nonoperatively, thresholds involving cervical stenosis, and postoperative recommendations after spinal decompression and/or fusion surgery. CONCLUSION: Elite American football athletes are at high risk for cervical spine injury due to the nature of their sport. The decision to allow these athletes to return to play should involve an understanding of the average RTP time, the potential risks of recurrence or re-injury, and individual characteristics such as position played and pathology on imaging.Level of Evidence: 3.

The content and accessibility of spine surgery fellowship websites and the North American Spine Surgery (NASS) fellowship directory.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The North American Spine Society (NASS) spine fellowship directory is an established resource that provides applicants with access to important information about different fellowship programs. Additionally, some programs have created websites to provide information about their fellowship program. There has been limited research on the amount and breadth of information provided by these different resources. PURPOSE: To assess and compare the scope of information provided by the North American Spine Society (NASS) fellowship directory and individual fellowship program websites. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Web Content Accessibility Study. PATIENT SAMPLE: There were no patient data used in this study. All reported data were accessed from public websites and the NASS fellowship directory (August 2022 fellowships). OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures were reported as the presence or lack thereof of 22 topics pertaining to the specifics of each individual spine fellowship program on both the NASS fellowship directory and individual fellowship program websites. METHODS: The NASS fellowship directory (August 2022 fellowships) and individual program websites were evaluated by two independent reviewers. Program websites were identified via Google search with a systematic protocol. Within each platform, the availability of various data were recorded. Twenty-four different data points were assessed for each program and were categorized into four main categories-general program information, fellow profiles, clinical roles, and nonclinical roles of the fellow. Chi-squared tests were used to compare differences in the availability of specific data provided by the NASS fellowship directory and individual program websites. RESULTS: Seventy-four fellowship programs were identified. The NASS fellowship directory was more likely to provide information about the application process, a description of the program, fellow salary, faculty members, case descriptions, and research requirements (p<.05). The program websites were more likely to provide information about current and previous fellows-including a list of current fellow(s), their education/training, and a list of the previous fellows and their job choice (p<.05). Program websites were also more likely to discuss rotation schedules, clinic expectations, research opportunities, journal club, institutional meetings, sponsored national meetings, and current/previous research (p<.05). However, certain information, including specific clinical responsibilities (eg, rotation schedule, call expectations, clinic expectations) and the profiles of current and previous fellows, were not well represented on either platform. CONCLUSIONS: There were significant differences in the type of information provided by the NASS fellowship directory and program websites. Furthermore, there were key pieces of information that were not well represented on either platform.

Evaluating the Early Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Sports Surgery Fellowship Education.

Purpose The COVID-19 pandemic forced many hospitals to cancel elective surgeries to minimize the risk of viral transmission and ensure the availability of vital health resources. The unintended consequences of this action on the education and training of orthopaedic sports surgeons are unknown. The purpose of this study is to measure the impact of COVID-19 on orthopaedic sports surgery fellows, their education and training, and their readiness for practice. Methods A comprehensive survey was created and distributed to all U.S. fellows and fellowship directors registered with the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine. Responses were collected between April 22, 2020, and May 5, 2020. Results Fifty-one sports fellows and twenty-nine sports fellowship directors completed the survey. Over 80.4% of fellows reported a greater than 50% decrease in the case volume since the cessation of elective cases. Average hours worked per week decreased by 58.2% during the pandemic. Fellows reported completing an average of 324.6 ± 97.4 cases prior to the COVID-19 crisis and 86.0% expected to complete at least 11% to 25% fewer cases by graduation compared to previous fellows. 87.5% of fellows were not concerned about their ability to complete their fellowship training but more than one-third of fellows voiced concerns to their fellowship directors regarding their readiness for independent practice. Fellowship directors were generally not concerned that COVID-19 would prevent their fellows from completing the fellowship. At least 54.2% are somewhat concerned about the impact of COVID-19 on their future job opportunities. Conclusions The COVID-19 pandemic has universally affected work hours and case volume of sports fellows. Nevertheless, most sports fellows feel prepared to enter practice and are generally supported by the confidence of their fellowship directors. The results of this survey emphasize the importance of the fellowship year in sports training and highlight the future of online education and simulation as useful adjuncts.

Intraoperative image guidance for lateral position surgery.

Recent advances in minimally invasive spine surgery techniques have precipitated the popularity of lateral position spine surgery, such as lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF). Lateral position surgery offers a unique, minimally invasive approach to the lumbar spine that allows for preservation of anterior and posterior spinal elements. Traditionally, surgeons have relied upon fluoroscopy for triangulation and implant placement. Over the last decade, intraoperative 3-dimensional navigation (ION) has risen to the forefront of innovation in LLIF and OLIF. This technology utilizes intra-operative advanced imaging, such as comminuted tomography (CT), to map the patient's 3D anatomy and allows the surgeon to accurately visualize instruments and implants in spatial relationship to the patient's anatomy in real time. ION has the potential to improve accuracy during instrumentation, decrease operating room times, lower radiation exposure to the surgeon and staff, and increase feasibility of single-position surgery during which the spine is instrumented both laterally and posteriorly while the patient remains in the lateral decubitus position. Despite the advantages of ION, the intra-operative radiation exposure risk to patients is controversial. Future directions include continued innovation in ultra low radiation imaging (ULRI) techniques and image enhancement technology and in uses of robot-assisted navigation in single-position spine surgery.